Las Vegas, NV vs Seattle, WA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Seattle, WA outspends Las Vegas, NV by a wide margin per resident — $34,463 versus $9,085, a 279% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Las Vegas, NV holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 82/100 (grade A) against 61/100 (grade C) for Seattle, WA — a 21-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Las Vegas, NV reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Seattle, WA carries $1,100 per resident. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Las Vegas, NV at $1,028 per resident and in Seattle, WA at $3,923.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Las Vegas, NV at 34% of total revenue, whereas Seattle, WA relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 13%.
Summary
Seattle spends 73.6% more per capita than Las Vegas ($25,377/person difference). Las Vegas, NV has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 82/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $50 | $1,831 |
| Sales Tax | $386 | $1,094 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $3,496 |
| Intergovernmental | $1,137 | $9,846 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $3,960 |
| Other | $2,806 | $8,544 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $945 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $280 | $210 |
| Highways & Roads | $45 | $0 |
| Education | $0 | $1,461 |
| Public Welfare | $705 | $3,439 |
| Health | $0 | $1,131 |
| Hospitals | $356 | $1,871 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,028 | $3,923 |
| Housing | $23 | $3,727 |
| Sewerage | $332 | $952 |
| Utilities | $129 | $6,489 |
| Other | $5,243 | $11,260 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.