Las Vegas, NV vs Portland, OR
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Portland, OR outspends Las Vegas, NV by a wide margin per resident — $23,675 versus $9,085, a 161% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Las Vegas, NV holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 82/100 (grade A) against 63/100 (grade C) for Portland, OR — a 19-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Las Vegas, NV reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Portland, OR carries $1,574 per resident. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Las Vegas, NV at $1,028 per resident and in Portland, OR at $2,477.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Las Vegas, NV at 34% of total revenue, whereas Portland, OR relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 19%.
Summary
Portland spends 61.6% more per capita than Las Vegas ($14,589/person difference). Las Vegas, NV has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 82/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $50 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $386 | $1,695 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $130 |
| Intergovernmental | $1,137 | $8,979 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $3,883 |
| Other | $2,806 | $7,916 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $945 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $280 | $1,700 |
| Highways & Roads | $45 | $139 |
| Public Welfare | $705 | $3,607 |
| Hospitals | $356 | $2,893 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,028 | $2,477 |
| Housing | $23 | $3,694 |
| Sewerage | $332 | $630 |
| Utilities | $129 | $1,845 |
| Other | $5,243 | $6,689 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.