Las Vegas, NV vs Fresno, CA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Fresno, CA outspends Las Vegas, NV by a wide margin per resident — $43,387 versus $9,085, a 378% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Las Vegas, NV holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 82/100 (grade A) against 50/100 (grade C) for Fresno, CA — a 32-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Neither city reports outstanding debt per resident in its current Census filing, which removes debt service as a point of difference between them. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Las Vegas, NV leads with parks and recreation at $1,028 per resident, while Fresno, CA leads with education at $3,942.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on other revenue — 34% of total revenue in Las Vegas, NV and 19% in Fresno, CA.
Summary
Fresno spends 79.1% more per capita than Las Vegas ($34,302/person difference). Las Vegas, NV has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 82/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $50 | $337 |
| Sales Tax | $386 | $19 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $501 |
| Intergovernmental | $1,137 | -$4,470 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $11 |
| Other | $2,806 | $2,070 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $945 | $3,261 |
| Fire Protection | $280 | $568 |
| Highways & Roads | $45 | $0 |
| Education | $0 | $3,942 |
| Public Welfare | $705 | $1,946 |
| Health | $0 | $599 |
| Hospitals | $356 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,028 | $76 |
| Housing | $23 | $2,856 |
| Sewerage | $332 | $0 |
| Utilities | $129 | $15,340 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $255 |
| Other | $5,243 | $14,545 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.