Lancaster, PA vs Reading, PA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Lancaster, PA outspends Reading, PA by a wide margin per resident — $51,351 versus $16,327, a 215% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Reading, PA holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 86/100 (grade A) against 51/100 (grade C) for Lancaster, PA — a 35-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Lancaster, PA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Reading, PA carries $87 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Lancaster, PA leads with police at $5,263 per resident, while Reading, PA leads with parks and recreation at $826.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Lancaster, PA at 100% of total revenue, whereas Reading, PA relies most on other revenue at 28%.
Summary
Lancaster spends 214.5% more per capita than Reading ($35,023/person difference). Reading, PA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 86/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $47 |
| Sales Tax | $72 | $60 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $956 |
| Intergovernmental | $24,786 | $767 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $3,742 |
| Other | $4,613 | $6,157 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $5,263 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $4,067 | $256 |
| Highways & Roads | $500 | $92 |
| Public Welfare | $24 | $1,502 |
| Health | $417 | $180 |
| Hospitals | $6,387 | $672 |
| Parks & Recreation | $278 | $826 |
| Housing | $2,619 | $4,415 |
| Utilities | $7,457 | $3,304 |
| Interest on Debt | $76 | $0 |
| Other | $24,262 | $5,080 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.