Lancaster, PA vs Bethlehem, PA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Lancaster, PA outspends Bethlehem, PA by a wide margin per resident — $51,351 versus $14,468, a 255% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Bethlehem, PA holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 88/100 (grade A) against 51/100 (grade C) for Lancaster, PA — a 37-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Neither city reports outstanding debt per resident in its current Census filing, which removes debt service as a point of difference between them. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Lancaster, PA leads with police at $5,263 per resident, while Bethlehem, PA leads with fire protection at $1,642.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Lancaster, PA at 100% of total revenue, whereas Bethlehem, PA relies most on other revenue at 16%.
Summary
Lancaster spends 254.9% more per capita than Bethlehem ($36,883/person difference). Bethlehem, PA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 88/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $1 |
| Sales Tax | $72 | $405 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $308 |
| Intergovernmental | $24,786 | $3,237 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $3,296 |
| Other | $4,613 | $3,969 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $5,263 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $4,067 | $1,642 |
| Highways & Roads | $500 | $668 |
| Public Welfare | $24 | $1,218 |
| Health | $417 | $187 |
| Hospitals | $6,387 | $526 |
| Parks & Recreation | $278 | $634 |
| Housing | $2,619 | $2,229 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $68 |
| Utilities | $7,457 | $2,000 |
| Interest on Debt | $76 | $0 |
| Other | $24,262 | $5,296 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.