Lakewood, CO vs Aurora, CO
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Aurora, CO outspends Lakewood, CO by a wide margin per resident — $17,400 versus $10,295, a 69% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Aurora, CO holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 66/100 (grade B) against 56/100 (grade C) for Lakewood, CO — a 10-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Lakewood, CO carries the lighter load at $1 per resident versus $4,017 for Aurora, CO. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Lakewood, CO at $2,250 per resident and in Aurora, CO at $1,299.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Lakewood, CO at 167% of total revenue, whereas Aurora, CO relies most on charges and fees at 17%.
Summary
Aurora spends 40.8% more per capita than Lakewood ($7,104/person difference). Aurora, CO has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 66/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $897 | $303 |
| Intergovernmental | $1,276 | $825 |
| Charges & Fees | $82 | $3,728 |
| Other | $2,128 | $2,042 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $205 | $785 |
| Public Welfare | $1,061 | $1,001 |
| Health | $0 | $185 |
| Hospitals | $70 | $678 |
| Parks & Recreation | $2,250 | $1,299 |
| Housing | $3,750 | $3,493 |
| Sewerage | $176 | $0 |
| Utilities | $79 | $1,978 |
| Other | $2,705 | $7,981 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.