Kent, WA vs Spokane Valley, WA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Kent, WA outspends Spokane Valley, WA by a wide margin per resident — $10,491 versus $5,097, a 106% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Spokane Valley, WA holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 68/100 (grade B) against 57/100 (grade C) for Kent, WA — a 11-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Spokane Valley, WA carries the lighter load at $5 per resident versus $905 for Kent, WA. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Kent, WA at $1,448 per resident and in Spokane Valley, WA at $259.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on other revenue — 49% of total revenue in Kent, WA and 34% in Spokane Valley, WA.
Summary
Kent spends 105.8% more per capita than Spokane Valley ($5,394/person difference). Spokane Valley, WA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 68/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $201 |
| Sales Tax | $272 | $17 |
| Income Tax | $89 | $26 |
| Intergovernmental | $1,884 | $100 |
| Charges & Fees | $1,797 | $0 |
| Other | $4,935 | $421 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $413 | $169 |
| Fire Protection | $292 | $189 |
| Highways & Roads | -$10 | $112 |
| Public Welfare | $850 | $784 |
| Health | $0 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $207 | $221 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,448 | $259 |
| Housing | $3,476 | $2,595 |
| Sewerage | $36 | $43 |
| Utilities | $1,474 | $31 |
| Interest on Debt | $1 | $0 |
| Other | $2,306 | $695 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.