Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Kent, WA vs Federal Way, WA

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Kent spends 35.4% more per capita than Federal Way ($2,742/person difference). Federal Way, WA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 67/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Kent, WA
Pop. 135,169
C
57/100
Budget Balance34
Debt Burden41
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity54
Trend Direction50
City B
Federal Way, WA
Pop. 99,614
B
67/100
Budget Balance31
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity41
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Kent
Federal Way
Total Spending
$1.4B
$771.9M
Spending / Capita
$10,491
$7,749
Total Revenue
$1.4B
$336.4M
Revenue / Capita
$10,134
$3,377
Total Debt
$122.3M
$0
Debt / Capita
$905
$0
Population
135,169
99,614
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Police
Kent$413
Federal Way$288
Fire Protection
Kent$292
Federal Way$205
Parks & Recreation
Kent$1,448
Federal Way$840
Health
Kent$0
Federal Way$0

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

KentFederal Way
Property Tax
$0
$122
Sales Tax
$272
$220
Income Tax
$89
$59
Intergovernmental
$1,884
$1,441
Charges & Fees
$1,797
$0
Other
$4,935
$1,369

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

KentFederal Way
Police
$413
$288
Fire Protection
$292
$205
Highways & Roads
-$10
$0
Public Welfare
$850
$1,037
Health
$0
$0
Hospitals
$207
$214
Parks & Recreation
$1,448
$840
Housing
$3,476
$2,945
Sewerage
$36
$0
Utilities
$1,474
$117
Interest on Debt
$1
$0
Other
$2,306
$2,103
C
Kent, WA
Fiscal Health Score: 57/100
Average fiscal health
B
Federal Way, WA
Fiscal Health Score: 67/100
Good fiscal health

Compare More Cities