Kenosha, WI vs Waukesha, WI
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Waukesha spends 50.1% more per capita than Kenosha ($19,195/person difference). Kenosha, WI has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 72/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $1 |
| Sales Tax | $477 | $891 |
| Income Tax | $19 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $4,020 | $3,249 |
| Other | $1,853 | $2,389 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $2,544 | $2,927 |
| Fire Protection | $374 | $856 |
| Highways & Roads | $330 | $1,204 |
| Public Welfare | $0 | $1,186 |
| Health | $259 | $523 |
| Parks & Recreation | $663 | $1,677 |
| Housing | $2,466 | $4,755 |
| Utilities | $4,909 | $6,106 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $88 |
| Other | $7,574 | $18,994 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.