Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Kansas City, MO vs Tulsa, OK

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Kansas City spends 334.6% more per capita than Tulsa ($17,570/person difference). Tulsa, OK has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 56/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Kansas City, MO
Pop. 505,958
C
52/100
Budget Balance1
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency76
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50
City B
Tulsa, OK
Pop. 411,938
C
56/100
Budget Balance4
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Kansas City
Tulsa
Total Spending
$11.5B
$2.2B
Spending / Capita
$22,820
$5,250
Total Revenue
$675.4M
$0
Revenue / Capita
$1,335
$0
Total Debt
$0
$0
Debt / Capita
$0
$0
Population
505,958
411,938
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Police
Kansas City$0
Tulsa$628
Fire Protection
Kansas City$119
Tulsa$196
Highways & Roads
Kansas City$0
Tulsa$257
Parks & Recreation
Kansas City$1,309
Tulsa$154
Health
Kansas City$0
Tulsa$762

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

Kansas CityTulsa
Sales Tax
$623
$97
Intergovernmental
$7
$0
Charges & Fees
$3,794
$0
Other
$11,150
$53

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

Kansas CityTulsa
Police
$0
$628
Fire Protection
$119
$196
Highways & Roads
$0
$257
Public Welfare
$3,018
$86
Health
$0
$762
Hospitals
$1,849
$0
Parks & Recreation
$1,309
$154
Housing
$4,681
$350
Sewerage
$0
$27
Utilities
$3,123
$41
Other
$8,721
$2,748
C
Kansas City, MO
Fiscal Health Score: 52/100
Average fiscal health
C
Tulsa, OK
Fiscal Health Score: 56/100
Average fiscal health

Compare More Cities