Kansas City, MO vs Raleigh, NC
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Kansas City, MO outspends Raleigh, NC by a wide margin per resident — $22,820 versus $13,911, a 64% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Raleigh, NC holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 76/100 (grade B) against 52/100 (grade C) for Kansas City, MO — a 24-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Kansas City, MO reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Raleigh, NC carries $906 per resident. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Kansas City, MO at $1,309 per resident and in Raleigh, NC at $1,391.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Kansas City, MO at 835% of total revenue, whereas Raleigh, NC relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 47%.
Summary
Kansas City spends 64.0% more per capita than Raleigh ($8,909/person difference). Raleigh, NC has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 76/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $623 | $858 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $806 |
| Intergovernmental | $7 | $14,128 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,794 | $2,681 |
| Other | $11,150 | $4,740 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $119 | $277 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $448 |
| Education | $0 | $6 |
| Public Welfare | $3,018 | $498 |
| Hospitals | $1,849 | $669 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,309 | $1,391 |
| Housing | $4,681 | $2,712 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $281 |
| Utilities | $3,123 | $2,469 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $1,513 |
| Other | $8,721 | $3,646 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.