Kansas City, MO vs Boston, MA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Boston, MA outspends Kansas City, MO by a wide margin per resident — $72,299 versus $22,820, a 217% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Boston, MA edges Kansas City, MO on the Fiscal Health Score by 4 points — 56/100 (grade C) to 52/100 (grade C). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
Kansas City, MO reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Boston, MA carries $445 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Kansas City, MO leads with parks and recreation at $1,309 per resident, while Boston, MA leads with education at $30,742.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Kansas City, MO at 835% of total revenue, whereas Boston, MA relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 17%.
Summary
Boston spends 68.4% more per capita than Kansas City ($49,479/person difference). Boston, MA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 56/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $623 | $78 |
| Intergovernmental | $7 | $5,357 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,794 | $2,784 |
| Other | $11,150 | $4,557 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $119 | $1,107 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $594 |
| Education | $0 | $30,742 |
| Public Welfare | $3,018 | $1,110 |
| Health | $0 | $725 |
| Hospitals | $1,849 | $2,584 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,309 | $711 |
| Housing | $4,681 | $6,614 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $355 |
| Utilities | $3,123 | $3,402 |
| General Admin | $0 | $5,401 |
| Other | $8,721 | $18,955 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.