Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Kansas City, MO vs Boston, MA

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Boston spends 68.4% more per capita than Kansas City ($49,479/person difference). Boston, MA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 56/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Kansas City, MO
Pop. 505,958
C
52/100
Budget Balance1
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency76
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50
City B
Boston, MA
Pop. 665,945
C
56/100
Budget Balance25
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency0
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Kansas City
Boston
Total Spending
$11.5B
$48.1B
Spending / Capita
$22,820
$72,299
Total Revenue
$675.4M
$20.8B
Revenue / Capita
$1,335
$31,243
Total Debt
$0
$296.3M
Debt / Capita
$0
$445
Population
505,958
665,945
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection
Kansas City$119
Boston$1,107
Highways & Roads
Kansas City$0
Boston$594
Parks & Recreation
Kansas City$1,309
Boston$711
Education
Kansas City$0
Boston$30,742
Health
Kansas City$0
Boston$725

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

Kansas CityBoston
Sales Tax
$623
$78
Intergovernmental
$7
$5,357
Charges & Fees
$3,794
$2,784
Other
$11,150
$4,557

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

Kansas CityBoston
Fire Protection
$119
$1,107
Highways & Roads
$0
$594
Education
$0
$30,742
Public Welfare
$3,018
$1,110
Health
$0
$725
Hospitals
$1,849
$2,584
Parks & Recreation
$1,309
$711
Housing
$4,681
$6,614
Sewerage
$0
$355
Utilities
$3,123
$3,402
General Admin
$0
$5,401
Other
$8,721
$18,955
C
Kansas City, MO
Fiscal Health Score: 52/100
Average fiscal health
C
Boston, MA
Fiscal Health Score: 56/100
Average fiscal health

Compare More Cities