Joliet, IL vs Aurora, IL
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Joliet, IL spends 22% more per resident than Aurora, IL: $18,675 against $15,301. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
Aurora, IL holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 87/100 (grade A) against 40/100 (grade D) for Joliet, IL — a 47-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Aurora, IL carries the lighter load at $489 per resident versus $4,260 for Joliet, IL. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Joliet, IL at $459 per resident and in Aurora, IL at $494.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 92% of total revenue in Joliet, IL and 5% in Aurora, IL.
Summary
Joliet spends 22.0% more per capita than Aurora ($3,374/person difference). Aurora, IL has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 87/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $323 | $114 |
| Income Tax | $1,006 | $144 |
| Intergovernmental | $12,066 | $2,481 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,156 | $2,224 |
| Other | $3,429 | $1,114 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $208 | $216 |
| Highways & Roads | $165 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $2,118 | $922 |
| Health | $450 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $485 | $257 |
| Parks & Recreation | $459 | $494 |
| Housing | $3,292 | $4,836 |
| Sewerage | $94 | $0 |
| Utilities | $3,400 | $2,366 |
| Other | $8,005 | $6,210 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.