Indianapolis city (balance), IN vs Omaha, NE
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Indianapolis city (balance), IN outspends Omaha, NE by a wide margin per resident — $46,045 versus $11,180, a 312% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Omaha, NE holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 74/100 (grade B) for Indianapolis city (balance), IN — a 16-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Omaha, NE reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Indianapolis city (balance), IN carries $577 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Indianapolis city (balance), IN leads with police at $2,032 per resident, while Omaha, NE leads with parks and recreation at $742.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on other revenue — 6% of total revenue in Indianapolis city (balance), IN and 17% in Omaha, NE.
Summary
Indianapolis city (balance) spends 311.8% more per capita than Omaha ($34,865/person difference). Omaha, NE has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $20 | $624 |
| Sales Tax | $178 | $373 |
| Income Tax | $136 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $1,312 | $2,622 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,813 | $0 |
| Other | $4,675 | $4,672 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $2,032 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $397 | $0 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $319 |
| Public Welfare | $1,469 | $1,521 |
| Health | $0 | $456 |
| Hospitals | $2,453 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $798 | $742 |
| Housing | $2,664 | $3,045 |
| Sewerage | $248 | $0 |
| Utilities | $2,227 | $581 |
| Interest on Debt | $1,381 | $0 |
| General Admin | $23,227 | $0 |
| Other | $9,149 | $4,516 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.