Houston, TX vs Fresno, CA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Fresno, CA outspends Houston, TX by a wide margin per resident — $43,387 versus $14,400, a 201% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Houston, TX holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 83/100 (grade A) against 50/100 (grade C) for Fresno, CA — a 33-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Fresno, CA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Houston, TX carries $863 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Houston, TX leads with parks and recreation at $361 per resident, while Fresno, CA leads with education at $3,942.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on other revenue — 7% of total revenue in Houston, TX and 19% in Fresno, CA.
Summary
Fresno spends 66.8% more per capita than Houston ($28,987/person difference). Houston, TX has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 83/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $337 |
| Sales Tax | $181 | $19 |
| Income Tax | $39 | $501 |
| Intergovernmental | $33 | -$4,470 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,475 | $11 |
| Other | $3,960 | $2,070 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $3,261 |
| Fire Protection | $295 | $568 |
| Highways & Roads | $175 | $0 |
| Education | $0 | $3,942 |
| Public Welfare | $533 | $1,946 |
| Health | $210 | $599 |
| Hospitals | $511 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $361 | $76 |
| Housing | $4,288 | $2,856 |
| Sewerage | $386 | $0 |
| Utilities | $1,339 | $15,340 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $255 |
| Other | $6,301 | $14,545 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.