Harrisburg, PA vs Pittsburgh, PA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Pittsburgh spends 99.7% more per capita than Harrisburg ($25,276/person difference). Harrisburg, PA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $35 |
| Sales Tax | $0 | $201 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $31 |
| Intergovernmental | -$1,698 | $2,136 |
| Other | $0 | $1,184 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $0 | $784 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $605 |
| Public Welfare | $0 | $4,568 |
| Hospitals | $73 | $214 |
| Parks & Recreation | $0 | $399 |
| Housing | $0 | $4,276 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $248 |
| Utilities | $0 | $690 |
| Other | $0 | $13,566 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.