Gresham, OR vs Medford, OR
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Medford, OR and Gresham, OR spend within 13.5% of each other per resident — $12,307 versus $10,840 — so on the headline spending-per-capita measure the two cities are effectively neck and neck.
Medford, OR holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 70/100 (grade B) against 46/100 (grade D) for Gresham, OR — a 24-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Gresham, OR carries the lighter load at $978 per resident versus $2,887 for Medford, OR. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Gresham, OR leads with fire protection at $459 per resident, while Medford, OR leads with parks and recreation at $822.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Gresham, OR at 100% of total revenue, whereas Medford, OR relies most on other revenue at 16%.
Summary
Medford spends 11.9% more per capita than Gresham ($1,467/person difference). Medford, OR has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 70/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $28 | $17 |
| Sales Tax | $5 | $241 |
| Income Tax | $69 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $4,893 | $1,848 |
| Charges & Fees | $1,652 | $2,768 |
| Other | $3,781 | $3,119 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $459 | $267 |
| Highways & Roads | $184 | $322 |
| Public Welfare | $944 | $1,096 |
| Hospitals | $662 | $311 |
| Parks & Recreation | $285 | $822 |
| Housing | $2,587 | $3,358 |
| Sewerage | $57 | $232 |
| Utilities | $1,126 | $1,690 |
| Other | $4,537 | $4,209 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.