Greeley, CO vs Westminster, CO
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Greeley, CO and Westminster, CO spend within 5.7% of each other per resident — $17,366 versus $16,434 — so on the headline spending-per-capita measure the two cities are effectively neck and neck.
Westminster, CO holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 62/100 (grade C) against 42/100 (grade D) for Greeley, CO — a 20-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Westminster, CO carries the lighter load at $1,137 per resident versus $1,247 for Greeley, CO. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Greeley, CO at $1,832 per resident and in Westminster, CO at $2,000.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Greeley, CO at 76% of total revenue, whereas Westminster, CO relies most on charges and fees at 15%.
Summary
Greeley spends 5.7% more per capita than Westminster ($932/person difference). Westminster, CO has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 62/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $79 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $982 | $1,178 |
| Intergovernmental | $10,897 | $2,709 |
| Charges & Fees | $5,308 | $4,287 |
| Other | $2,069 | $3,595 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $0 | $302 |
| Highways & Roads | $291 | $297 |
| Education | $1 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $712 | $964 |
| Health | $0 | $335 |
| Hospitals | $733 | $1,115 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,832 | $2,000 |
| Housing | $3,047 | $3,232 |
| Sewerage | $97 | $0 |
| Utilities | $4,341 | $1,475 |
| Interest on Debt | $893 | $0 |
| Other | $5,418 | $6,713 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.