Fresno, CA vs Wichita, KS
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Fresno, CA outspends Wichita, KS by a wide margin per resident — $43,387 versus $7,986, a 443% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Wichita, KS holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 50/100 (grade C) for Fresno, CA — a 40-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Fresno, CA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Wichita, KS carries $132 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Fresno, CA leads with education at $3,942 per resident, while Wichita, KS leads with parks and recreation at $874.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Fresno, CA at 19% of total revenue, whereas Wichita, KS relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 14%.
Summary
Fresno spends 443.3% more per capita than Wichita ($35,401/person difference). Wichita, KS has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $337 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $19 | $246 |
| Income Tax | $501 | $57 |
| Intergovernmental | -$4,470 | $3,895 |
| Charges & Fees | $11 | $3,193 |
| Other | $2,070 | $2,783 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $3,261 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $568 | $152 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $126 |
| Education | $3,942 | $2 |
| Public Welfare | $1,946 | $441 |
| Health | $599 | $254 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $113 |
| Parks & Recreation | $76 | $874 |
| Housing | $2,856 | $2,618 |
| Utilities | $15,340 | $1,225 |
| Interest on Debt | $255 | $70 |
| Other | $14,545 | $2,111 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.