Fresno, CA vs Raleigh, NC
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Fresno, CA outspends Raleigh, NC by a wide margin per resident — $43,387 versus $13,911, a 212% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Raleigh, NC holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 76/100 (grade B) against 50/100 (grade C) for Fresno, CA — a 26-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Fresno, CA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Raleigh, NC carries $906 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Fresno, CA leads with education at $3,942 per resident, while Raleigh, NC leads with parks and recreation at $1,391.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Fresno, CA at 19% of total revenue, whereas Raleigh, NC relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 47%.
Summary
Fresno spends 211.9% more per capita than Raleigh ($29,476/person difference). Raleigh, NC has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 76/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $337 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $19 | $858 |
| Income Tax | $501 | $806 |
| Intergovernmental | -$4,470 | $14,128 |
| Charges & Fees | $11 | $2,681 |
| Other | $2,070 | $4,740 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $3,261 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $568 | $277 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $448 |
| Education | $3,942 | $6 |
| Public Welfare | $1,946 | $498 |
| Health | $599 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $669 |
| Parks & Recreation | $76 | $1,391 |
| Housing | $2,856 | $2,712 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $281 |
| Utilities | $15,340 | $2,469 |
| Interest on Debt | $255 | $1,513 |
| Other | $14,545 | $3,646 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.