Fresno, CA vs Milwaukee, WI
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Fresno spends 123.4% more per capita than Milwaukee ($23,970/person difference). Milwaukee, WI has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 62/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $337 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $19 | $6,548 |
| Income Tax | $501 | $1 |
| Intergovernmental | -$4,470 | $1,231 |
| Charges & Fees | $11 | $0 |
| Other | $2,070 | $3,984 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $3,261 | $3,642 |
| Fire Protection | $568 | $802 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $23 |
| Education | $3,942 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $1,946 | $180 |
| Health | $599 | $1 |
| Parks & Recreation | $76 | $2,206 |
| Housing | $2,856 | $1,071 |
| Utilities | $15,340 | $1,866 |
| Interest on Debt | $255 | $1,608 |
| Other | $14,545 | $8,018 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.