Fresno, CA vs Boston, MA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Boston, MA outspends Fresno, CA by a wide margin per resident — $72,299 versus $43,387, a 67% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Boston, MA edges Fresno, CA on the Fiscal Health Score by 6 points — 56/100 (grade C) to 50/100 (grade C). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
Fresno, CA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Boston, MA carries $445 per resident. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: education leads in Fresno, CA at $3,942 per resident and in Boston, MA at $30,742.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Fresno, CA at 19% of total revenue, whereas Boston, MA relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 17%.
Summary
Boston spends 40.0% more per capita than Fresno ($28,912/person difference). Boston, MA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 56/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $337 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $19 | $78 |
| Income Tax | $501 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | -$4,470 | $5,357 |
| Charges & Fees | $11 | $2,784 |
| Other | $2,070 | $4,557 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $3,261 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $568 | $1,107 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $594 |
| Education | $3,942 | $30,742 |
| Public Welfare | $1,946 | $1,110 |
| Health | $599 | $725 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $2,584 |
| Parks & Recreation | $76 | $711 |
| Housing | $2,856 | $6,614 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $355 |
| Utilities | $15,340 | $3,402 |
| Interest on Debt | $255 | $0 |
| General Admin | $0 | $5,401 |
| Other | $14,545 | $18,955 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.