Fort Worth, TX vs Seattle, WA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Seattle, WA outspends Fort Worth, TX by a wide margin per resident — $34,463 versus $15,939, a 116% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Fort Worth, TX edges Seattle, WA on the Fiscal Health Score by 2 points — 63/100 (grade C) to 61/100 (grade C). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
On debt, Seattle, WA carries the lighter load at $1,100 per resident versus $1,921 for Fort Worth, TX. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Fort Worth, TX at $708 per resident and in Seattle, WA at $3,923.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 15% of total revenue in Fort Worth, TX and 13% in Seattle, WA.
Summary
Seattle spends 53.7% more per capita than Fort Worth ($18,523/person difference). Fort Worth, TX has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 63/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $1,831 |
| Sales Tax | $198 | $1,094 |
| Income Tax | $851 | $3,496 |
| Intergovernmental | $4,002 | $9,846 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,594 | $3,960 |
| Other | $3,439 | $8,544 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $156 | $210 |
| Highways & Roads | $317 | $0 |
| Education | $0 | $1,461 |
| Public Welfare | $869 | $3,439 |
| Health | $235 | $1,131 |
| Hospitals | $1,680 | $1,871 |
| Parks & Recreation | $708 | $3,923 |
| Housing | $4,217 | $3,727 |
| Sewerage | $267 | $952 |
| Utilities | $2,674 | $6,489 |
| Other | $4,817 | $11,260 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.