Fort Worth, TX vs Minneapolis, MN
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Minneapolis, MN spends 37% more per resident than Fort Worth, TX: $21,910 against $15,939. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
Minneapolis, MN edges Fort Worth, TX on the Fiscal Health Score by 2 points — 65/100 (grade B) to 63/100 (grade C). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
On debt, Minneapolis, MN carries the lighter load at $644 per resident versus $1,921 for Fort Worth, TX. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Fort Worth, TX at $708 per resident and in Minneapolis, MN at $3,486.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Fort Worth, TX at 15% of total revenue, whereas Minneapolis, MN relies most on other revenue at 17%.
Summary
Minneapolis spends 27.3% more per capita than Fort Worth ($5,971/person difference). Minneapolis, MN has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 65/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $198 | $1,989 |
| Income Tax | $851 | $994 |
| Intergovernmental | $4,002 | $2,929 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,594 | $2,040 |
| Other | $3,439 | $3,254 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $156 | $683 |
| Highways & Roads | $317 | $221 |
| Public Welfare | $869 | $1,500 |
| Health | $235 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $1,680 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $708 | $3,486 |
| Housing | $4,217 | $4,133 |
| Sewerage | $267 | $570 |
| Utilities | $2,674 | $2,398 |
| Other | $4,817 | $8,919 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.