Fort Worth, TX vs Mesa, AZ
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Fort Worth, TX spends 25% more per resident than Mesa, AZ: $15,939 against $12,768. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
Mesa, AZ holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 63/100 (grade C) for Fort Worth, TX — a 27-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Mesa, AZ carries the lighter load at $469 per resident versus $1,921 for Fort Worth, TX. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Fort Worth, TX at $708 per resident and in Mesa, AZ at $953.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Fort Worth, TX at 15% of total revenue, whereas Mesa, AZ relies most on charges and fees at 9%.
Summary
Fort Worth spends 24.8% more per capita than Mesa ($3,171/person difference). Mesa, AZ has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $47 |
| Sales Tax | $198 | $463 |
| Income Tax | $851 | $1,376 |
| Intergovernmental | $4,002 | $1,383 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,594 | $3,334 |
| Other | $3,439 | $2,253 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $156 | $422 |
| Highways & Roads | $317 | $192 |
| Public Welfare | $869 | $829 |
| Health | $235 | $147 |
| Hospitals | $1,680 | $537 |
| Parks & Recreation | $708 | $953 |
| Housing | $4,217 | $4,190 |
| Sewerage | $267 | $38 |
| Utilities | $2,674 | $2,376 |
| Other | $4,817 | $3,082 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.