Fort Worth, TX vs Bakersfield, CA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Fort Worth spends 37.7% more per capita than Bakersfield ($4,363/person difference). Fort Worth, TX has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 63/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $1 |
| Sales Tax | $198 | $20 |
| Income Tax | $851 | $1,909 |
| Intergovernmental | $4,002 | $3,862 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,594 | $1,024 |
| Other | $3,439 | $1,915 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $156 | $0 |
| Highways & Roads | $317 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $869 | $840 |
| Health | $235 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $1,680 | $425 |
| Parks & Recreation | $708 | $741 |
| Housing | $4,217 | $3,391 |
| Sewerage | $267 | $265 |
| Utilities | $2,674 | $2,679 |
| Other | $4,817 | $3,234 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.