Federal Way, WA vs Vancouver, WA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Vancouver spends 42.3% more per capita than Federal Way ($5,686/person difference). Federal Way, WA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 67/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $122 | $31 |
| Sales Tax | $220 | $456 |
| Income Tax | $59 | $140 |
| Intergovernmental | $1,441 | $141 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $2,641 |
| Other | $1,369 | $6,500 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $288 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $205 | $0 |
| Education | $0 | $3 |
| Public Welfare | $1,037 | $968 |
| Hospitals | $214 | $661 |
| Parks & Recreation | $840 | $871 |
| Housing | $2,945 | $3,594 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $241 |
| Utilities | $117 | $2,481 |
| Other | $2,103 | $4,615 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.