Federal Way, WA vs Everett, WA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Everett, WA outspends Federal Way, WA by a wide margin per resident — $26,447 versus $7,749, a 241% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
On the CitySpend Fiscal Health Score the two are level: Federal Way, WA and Everett, WA both land at 67/100 (grade B and B respectively), so the deciding factors sit in the underlying six-factor breakdown rather than the rolled-up grade.
Federal Way, WA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Everett, WA carries $141 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Federal Way, WA leads with parks and recreation at $840 per resident, while Everett, WA leads with fire protection at $1,790.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Federal Way, WA at 43% of total revenue, whereas Everett, WA relies most on other revenue at 24%.
Summary
Everett spends 70.7% more per capita than Federal Way ($18,699/person difference). Both cities share the same Fiscal Health Score.
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $122 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $220 | $362 |
| Income Tax | $59 | $235 |
| Intergovernmental | $1,441 | $4,248 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $4,469 |
| Other | $1,369 | $6,125 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $288 | $290 |
| Fire Protection | $205 | $1,790 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $251 |
| Public Welfare | $1,037 | $714 |
| Health | $0 | $379 |
| Hospitals | $214 | $284 |
| Parks & Recreation | $840 | $1,098 |
| Housing | $2,945 | $3,492 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $268 |
| Utilities | $117 | $6,827 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $2,198 |
| Other | $2,103 | $8,856 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.