Fayetteville, AR vs Fort Smith, AR
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Fort Smith, AR and Fayetteville, AR spend within 12.1% of each other per resident — $14,015 versus $12,502 — so on the headline spending-per-capita measure the two cities are effectively neck and neck.
Fort Smith, AR holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 69/100 (grade B) against 57/100 (grade C) for Fayetteville, AR — a 12-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Fayetteville, AR carries the lighter load at $925 per resident versus $1,000 for Fort Smith, AR. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Fayetteville, AR leads with health at $800 per resident, while Fort Smith, AR leads with parks and recreation at $549.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Fayetteville, AR at 59% of total revenue, whereas Fort Smith, AR relies most on other revenue at 13%.
Summary
Fort Smith spends 10.8% more per capita than Fayetteville ($1,513/person difference). Fort Smith, AR has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 69/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $8 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $293 | $143 |
| Income Tax | $1,543 | $2,263 |
| Intergovernmental | $7,947 | $40 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,512 | $3,270 |
| Other | $3,271 | $3,396 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $423 | $295 |
| Education | $32 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $719 | $788 |
| Health | $800 | $375 |
| Hospitals | $109 | $185 |
| Parks & Recreation | $599 | $549 |
| Housing | $2,095 | $2,224 |
| Sewerage | $156 | $0 |
| Utilities | $3,578 | $4,214 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $291 |
| Other | $3,991 | $5,094 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.