Fall River, MA vs Springfield, MA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Springfield spends 37.1% more per capita than Fall River ($24,375/person difference). Springfield, MA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (D, 44/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $165 | $34 |
| Intergovernmental | $5,430 | $15,275 |
| Charges & Fees | $1,459 | $0 |
| Other | $4,494 | $770 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $265 | $829 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $308 |
| Education | $28,175 | $47,090 |
| Public Welfare | $581 | $640 |
| Health | $178 | $453 |
| Hospitals | $602 | $861 |
| Parks & Recreation | $211 | $673 |
| Housing | $2,452 | $3,784 |
| Sewerage | $127 | $282 |
| Utilities | $1,773 | $200 |
| Other | $6,887 | $10,507 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.