Fall River, MA vs Boston, MA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Boston, MA outspends Fall River, MA by a wide margin per resident — $72,299 versus $41,251, a 75% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Boston, MA holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 56/100 (grade C) against 41/100 (grade D) for Fall River, MA — a 15-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Boston, MA carries the lighter load at $445 per resident versus $585 for Fall River, MA. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: education leads in Fall River, MA at $28,175 per resident and in Boston, MA at $30,742.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 15% of total revenue in Fall River, MA and 17% in Boston, MA.
Summary
Boston spends 42.9% more per capita than Fall River ($31,048/person difference). Boston, MA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 56/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $165 | $78 |
| Intergovernmental | $5,430 | $5,357 |
| Charges & Fees | $1,459 | $2,784 |
| Other | $4,494 | $4,557 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $265 | $1,107 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $594 |
| Education | $28,175 | $30,742 |
| Public Welfare | $581 | $1,110 |
| Health | $178 | $725 |
| Hospitals | $602 | $2,584 |
| Parks & Recreation | $211 | $711 |
| Housing | $2,452 | $6,614 |
| Sewerage | $127 | $355 |
| Utilities | $1,773 | $3,402 |
| General Admin | $0 | $5,401 |
| Other | $6,887 | $18,955 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.