Eugene, OR vs Gresham, OR
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Eugene, OR spends 51% more per resident than Gresham, OR: $16,408 against $10,840. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
Eugene, OR holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 56/100 (grade C) against 46/100 (grade D) for Gresham, OR — a 10-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Gresham, OR carries the lighter load at $978 per resident versus $1,623 for Eugene, OR. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Eugene, OR leads with parks and recreation at $1,585 per resident, while Gresham, OR leads with fire protection at $459.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Eugene, OR at 28% of total revenue, whereas Gresham, OR relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 100%.
Summary
Eugene spends 51.4% more per capita than Gresham ($5,569/person difference). Eugene, OR has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 56/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $28 |
| Sales Tax | $717 | $5 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $69 |
| Intergovernmental | $931 | $4,893 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,493 | $1,652 |
| Other | $5,260 | $3,781 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $308 | $459 |
| Highways & Roads | $491 | $184 |
| Public Welfare | $861 | $944 |
| Health | $933 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $670 | $662 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,585 | $285 |
| Housing | $4,088 | $2,587 |
| Sewerage | $671 | $57 |
| Utilities | $1,674 | $1,126 |
| Other | $5,128 | $4,537 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.