El Paso, TX vs Bakersfield, CA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
El Paso, TX outspends Bakersfield, CA by a wide margin per resident — $24,259 versus $11,576, a 110% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
El Paso, TX edges Bakersfield, CA on the Fiscal Health Score by 5 points — 61/100 (grade C) to 56/100 (grade C). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
Neither city reports outstanding debt per resident in its current Census filing, which removes debt service as a point of difference between them. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: El Paso, TX leads with police at $1,159 per resident, while Bakersfield, CA leads with parks and recreation at $741.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 10% of total revenue in El Paso, TX and 100% in Bakersfield, CA.
Summary
El Paso spends 109.6% more per capita than Bakersfield ($12,683/person difference). El Paso, TX has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 61/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $1 |
| Sales Tax | $65 | $20 |
| Income Tax | $12 | $1,909 |
| Intergovernmental | $690 | $3,862 |
| Charges & Fees | $31 | $1,024 |
| Other | $550 | $1,915 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $1,159 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $233 | $0 |
| Highways & Roads | $83 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $299 | $840 |
| Hospitals | $11 | $425 |
| Parks & Recreation | $151 | $741 |
| Housing | $958 | $3,391 |
| Sewerage | $6 | $265 |
| Utilities | $224 | $2,679 |
| Interest on Debt | $40 | $0 |
| General Admin | $17,951 | $0 |
| Other | $3,145 | $3,234 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.