Edmond, OK vs Oklahoma City, OK
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Oklahoma City spends 23.1% more per capita than Edmond ($4,184/person difference). Edmond, OK has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 89/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $197 | $763 |
| Income Tax | $1,194 | $1,037 |
| Intergovernmental | $11,725 | $6,852 |
| Charges & Fees | $4,504 | $3,256 |
| Other | $3,803 | $1,836 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $0 | $513 |
| Education | $51 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $839 | $1,525 |
| Health | $0 | $5 |
| Hospitals | $73 | $2,044 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,270 | $2,014 |
| Housing | $3,733 | $2,857 |
| Utilities | $2,768 | $4,523 |
| Interest on Debt | $247 | $707 |
| Other | $4,908 | $3,886 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.