Duluth, MN vs Plymouth, MN
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Duluth, MN outspends Plymouth, MN by a wide margin per resident — $32,786 versus $8,877, a 269% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Plymouth, MN holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 69/100 (grade B) against 30/100 (grade F) for Duluth, MN — a 39-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Plymouth, MN carries the lighter load at $222 per resident versus $1,961 for Duluth, MN. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Duluth, MN at $4,217 per resident and in Plymouth, MN at $1,549.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Duluth, MN at 32% of total revenue, whereas Plymouth, MN relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 100%.
Summary
Duluth spends 269.4% more per capita than Plymouth ($23,910/person difference). Plymouth, MN has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 69/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $1,363 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $2,261 | $613 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $149 |
| Intergovernmental | $1,348 | $7,979 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,388 | $1,754 |
| Other | $4,697 | $1,884 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $465 | $311 |
| Public Welfare | $1,859 | $820 |
| Health | $530 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $1,029 | $345 |
| Parks & Recreation | $4,217 | $1,549 |
| Housing | $3,654 | $2,036 |
| Utilities | $1,313 | $904 |
| Interest on Debt | $3,181 | $631 |
| Other | $16,539 | $2,281 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.