Denver, CO vs Fresno, CA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Fresno, CA spends 29% more per resident than Denver, CO: $43,387 against $33,582. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
Denver, CO edges Fresno, CA on the Fiscal Health Score by 1 points — 51/100 (grade C) to 50/100 (grade C). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
Fresno, CA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Denver, CO carries $5,126 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Denver, CO leads with parks and recreation at $3,319 per resident, while Fresno, CA leads with education at $3,942.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Denver, CO at 37% of total revenue, whereas Fresno, CA relies most on other revenue at 19%.
Summary
Fresno spends 22.6% more per capita than Denver ($9,805/person difference). Denver, CO has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 51/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $337 |
| Sales Tax | $2,070 | $19 |
| Income Tax | $236 | $501 |
| Intergovernmental | $44,661 | -$4,470 |
| Charges & Fees | $5,207 | $11 |
| Other | $10,100 | $2,070 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $2,455 | $3,261 |
| Fire Protection | $1,668 | $568 |
| Highways & Roads | $475 | $0 |
| Education | $821 | $3,942 |
| Public Welfare | $764 | $1,946 |
| Health | $693 | $599 |
| Hospitals | $2,855 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $3,319 | $76 |
| Housing | $3,565 | $2,856 |
| Sewerage | $293 | $0 |
| Utilities | $4,292 | $15,340 |
| Interest on Debt | $7 | $255 |
| General Admin | $364 | $0 |
| Other | $12,011 | $14,545 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.