Denver, CO vs Bakersfield, CA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Denver, CO outspends Bakersfield, CA by a wide margin per resident — $33,582 versus $11,576, a 190% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Bakersfield, CA edges Denver, CO on the Fiscal Health Score by 5 points — 56/100 (grade C) to 51/100 (grade C). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
Bakersfield, CA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Denver, CO carries $5,126 per resident. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Denver, CO at $3,319 per resident and in Bakersfield, CA at $741.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 37% of total revenue in Denver, CO and 100% in Bakersfield, CA.
Summary
Denver spends 190.1% more per capita than Bakersfield ($22,006/person difference). Bakersfield, CA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 56/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $1 |
| Sales Tax | $2,070 | $20 |
| Income Tax | $236 | $1,909 |
| Intergovernmental | $44,661 | $3,862 |
| Charges & Fees | $5,207 | $1,024 |
| Other | $10,100 | $1,915 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $2,455 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $1,668 | $0 |
| Highways & Roads | $475 | $0 |
| Education | $821 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $764 | $840 |
| Health | $693 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $2,855 | $425 |
| Parks & Recreation | $3,319 | $741 |
| Housing | $3,565 | $3,391 |
| Sewerage | $293 | $265 |
| Utilities | $4,292 | $2,679 |
| Interest on Debt | $7 | $0 |
| General Admin | $364 | $0 |
| Other | $12,011 | $3,234 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.