Denver, CO vs Aurora, CO
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Denver, CO outspends Aurora, CO by a wide margin per resident — $33,582 versus $17,400, a 93% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Aurora, CO holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 66/100 (grade B) against 51/100 (grade C) for Denver, CO — a 15-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Aurora, CO carries the lighter load at $4,017 per resident versus $5,126 for Denver, CO. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Denver, CO at $3,319 per resident and in Aurora, CO at $1,299.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Denver, CO at 37% of total revenue, whereas Aurora, CO relies most on charges and fees at 17%.
Summary
Denver spends 93.0% more per capita than Aurora ($16,182/person difference). Aurora, CO has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 66/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $2,070 | $303 |
| Income Tax | $236 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $44,661 | $825 |
| Charges & Fees | $5,207 | $3,728 |
| Other | $10,100 | $2,042 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $2,455 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $1,668 | $785 |
| Highways & Roads | $475 | $0 |
| Education | $821 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $764 | $1,001 |
| Health | $693 | $185 |
| Hospitals | $2,855 | $678 |
| Parks & Recreation | $3,319 | $1,299 |
| Housing | $3,565 | $3,493 |
| Sewerage | $293 | $0 |
| Utilities | $4,292 | $1,978 |
| Interest on Debt | $7 | $0 |
| General Admin | $364 | $0 |
| Other | $12,011 | $7,981 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.