Dearborn, MI vs Westland, MI
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Dearborn spends 29.3% more per capita than Westland ($3,911/person difference). Dearborn, MI has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 65/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $756 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $23,576 | $12,877 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,326 | $1,581 |
| Other | $3,543 | $3,274 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $1,938 | $1,333 |
| Highways & Roads | $21 | $145 |
| Public Welfare | $1,485 | $1,350 |
| Health | $492 | $859 |
| Hospitals | $222 | $136 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,639 | $555 |
| Housing | $3,896 | $2,581 |
| Sewerage | $219 | $0 |
| Utilities | $1,958 | $812 |
| Interest on Debt | $35 | $0 |
| Other | $5,368 | $5,590 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.