Columbia, SC vs North Charleston, SC
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Columbia, SC spends 54% more per resident than North Charleston, SC: $19,896 against $12,917. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
North Charleston, SC holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 80/100 (grade A) against 65/100 (grade B) for Columbia, SC — a 15-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
North Charleston, SC reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Columbia, SC carries $1,389 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Columbia, SC leads with parks and recreation at $1,265 per resident, while North Charleston, SC leads with fire protection at $1,323.
They also fund themselves differently: charges and fees is the largest single revenue source in Columbia, SC at 13% of total revenue, whereas North Charleston, SC relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 100%.
Summary
Columbia spends 54.0% more per capita than North Charleston ($6,979/person difference). North Charleston, SC has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 80/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $623 | $231 |
| Income Tax | $42 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $6,842 | $23,753 |
| Charges & Fees | $8,276 | $0 |
| Other | $6,537 | $632 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $467 | $1,323 |
| Highways & Roads | $454 | $867 |
| Public Welfare | $433 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $1,042 | $194 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,265 | $987 |
| Housing | $3,604 | $3,880 |
| Sewerage | $141 | $274 |
| Utilities | $4,665 | $650 |
| Other | $7,824 | $4,742 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.