Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Colorado Springs, CO vs Seattle, WA

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Seattle spends 61.6% more per capita than Colorado Springs ($21,240/person difference). Seattle, WA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 61/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Colorado Springs, CO
Pop. 479,612
C
59/100
Budget Balance54
Debt Burden0
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
City B
Seattle, WA
Pop. 734,603
C
61/100
Budget Balance69
Debt Burden50
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency22
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Colorado Springs
Seattle
Total Spending
$6.3B
$25.3B
Spending / Capita
$13,222
$34,463
Total Revenue
$25.3B
$56.5B
Revenue / Capita
$52,777
$76,958
Total Debt
$1.5B
$808.1M
Debt / Capita
$3,063
$1,100
Population
479,612
734,603
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection
Colorado Springs$1,266
Seattle$210
Parks & Recreation
Colorado Springs$376
Seattle$3,923
Education
Colorado Springs$0
Seattle$1,461
Health
Colorado Springs$0
Seattle$1,131

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

Colorado SpringsSeattle
Property Tax
$0
$1,831
Sales Tax
$257
$1,094
Income Tax
$0
$3,496
Intergovernmental
$6,902
$9,846
Charges & Fees
$5,676
$3,960
Other
$2,678
$8,544

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

Colorado SpringsSeattle
Fire Protection
$1,266
$210
Education
$0
$1,461
Public Welfare
$575
$3,439
Health
$0
$1,131
Hospitals
$416
$1,871
Parks & Recreation
$376
$3,923
Housing
$2,713
$3,727
Sewerage
$0
$952
Utilities
$2,566
$6,489
Interest on Debt
$190
$0
Other
$5,120
$11,260
C
Colorado Springs, CO
Fiscal Health Score: 59/100
Average fiscal health
C
Seattle, WA
Fiscal Health Score: 61/100
Average fiscal health

Compare More Cities