Colorado Springs, CO vs Milwaukee, WI
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Milwaukee, WI spends 47% more per resident than Colorado Springs, CO: $19,417 against $13,222. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
Milwaukee, WI edges Colorado Springs, CO on the Fiscal Health Score by 3 points — 62/100 (grade C) to 59/100 (grade C). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
Milwaukee, WI reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Colorado Springs, CO carries $3,063 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Colorado Springs, CO leads with fire protection at $1,266 per resident, while Milwaukee, WI leads with police at $3,642.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Colorado Springs, CO at 13% of total revenue, whereas Milwaukee, WI relies most on sales tax at 59%.
Summary
Milwaukee spends 31.9% more per capita than Colorado Springs ($6,195/person difference). Milwaukee, WI has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 62/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $257 | $6,548 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $1 |
| Intergovernmental | $6,902 | $1,231 |
| Charges & Fees | $5,676 | $0 |
| Other | $2,678 | $3,984 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $3,642 |
| Fire Protection | $1,266 | $802 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $23 |
| Public Welfare | $575 | $180 |
| Health | $0 | $1 |
| Hospitals | $416 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $376 | $2,206 |
| Housing | $2,713 | $1,071 |
| Utilities | $2,566 | $1,866 |
| Interest on Debt | $190 | $1,608 |
| Other | $5,120 | $8,018 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.