Colorado Springs, CO vs Mesa, AZ
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Colorado Springs, CO and Mesa, AZ spend within 3.6% of each other per resident — $13,222 versus $12,768 — so on the headline spending-per-capita measure the two cities are effectively neck and neck.
Mesa, AZ holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 59/100 (grade C) for Colorado Springs, CO — a 31-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Mesa, AZ carries the lighter load at $469 per resident versus $3,063 for Colorado Springs, CO. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Colorado Springs, CO leads with fire protection at $1,266 per resident, while Mesa, AZ leads with parks and recreation at $953.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Colorado Springs, CO at 13% of total revenue, whereas Mesa, AZ relies most on charges and fees at 9%.
Summary
Colorado Springs spends 3.6% more per capita than Mesa ($454/person difference). Mesa, AZ has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $47 |
| Sales Tax | $257 | $463 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $1,376 |
| Intergovernmental | $6,902 | $1,383 |
| Charges & Fees | $5,676 | $3,334 |
| Other | $2,678 | $2,253 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $1,266 | $422 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $192 |
| Public Welfare | $575 | $829 |
| Health | $0 | $147 |
| Hospitals | $416 | $537 |
| Parks & Recreation | $376 | $953 |
| Housing | $2,713 | $4,190 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $38 |
| Utilities | $2,566 | $2,376 |
| Interest on Debt | $190 | $0 |
| Other | $5,120 | $3,082 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.