Colorado Springs, CO vs Fresno, CA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Fresno, CA outspends Colorado Springs, CO by a wide margin per resident — $43,387 versus $13,222, a 228% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Colorado Springs, CO holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 59/100 (grade C) against 50/100 (grade C) for Fresno, CA — a 9-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Fresno, CA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Colorado Springs, CO carries $3,063 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Colorado Springs, CO leads with fire protection at $1,266 per resident, while Fresno, CA leads with education at $3,942.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Colorado Springs, CO at 13% of total revenue, whereas Fresno, CA relies most on other revenue at 19%.
Summary
Fresno spends 69.5% more per capita than Colorado Springs ($30,165/person difference). Colorado Springs, CO has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 59/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $337 |
| Sales Tax | $257 | $19 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $501 |
| Intergovernmental | $6,902 | -$4,470 |
| Charges & Fees | $5,676 | $11 |
| Other | $2,678 | $2,070 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $3,261 |
| Fire Protection | $1,266 | $568 |
| Education | $0 | $3,942 |
| Public Welfare | $575 | $1,946 |
| Health | $0 | $599 |
| Hospitals | $416 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $376 | $76 |
| Housing | $2,713 | $2,856 |
| Utilities | $2,566 | $15,340 |
| Interest on Debt | $190 | $255 |
| Other | $5,120 | $14,545 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.