Colorado Springs, CO vs Boston, MA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Boston, MA outspends Colorado Springs, CO by a wide margin per resident — $72,299 versus $13,222, a 447% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Colorado Springs, CO edges Boston, MA on the Fiscal Health Score by 3 points — 59/100 (grade C) to 56/100 (grade C). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
On debt, Boston, MA carries the lighter load at $445 per resident versus $3,063 for Colorado Springs, CO. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Colorado Springs, CO leads with fire protection at $1,266 per resident, while Boston, MA leads with education at $30,742.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 13% of total revenue in Colorado Springs, CO and 17% in Boston, MA.
Summary
Boston spends 81.7% more per capita than Colorado Springs ($59,076/person difference). Colorado Springs, CO has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 59/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $257 | $78 |
| Intergovernmental | $6,902 | $5,357 |
| Charges & Fees | $5,676 | $2,784 |
| Other | $2,678 | $4,557 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $1,266 | $1,107 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $594 |
| Education | $0 | $30,742 |
| Public Welfare | $575 | $1,110 |
| Health | $0 | $725 |
| Hospitals | $416 | $2,584 |
| Parks & Recreation | $376 | $711 |
| Housing | $2,713 | $6,614 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $355 |
| Utilities | $2,566 | $3,402 |
| Interest on Debt | $190 | $0 |
| General Admin | $0 | $5,401 |
| Other | $5,120 | $18,955 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.