Colorado Springs, CO vs Aurora, CO
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Aurora spends 24.0% more per capita than Colorado Springs ($4,178/person difference). Aurora, CO has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 66/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $257 | $303 |
| Intergovernmental | $6,902 | $825 |
| Charges & Fees | $5,676 | $3,728 |
| Other | $2,678 | $2,042 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $1,266 | $785 |
| Public Welfare | $575 | $1,001 |
| Health | $0 | $185 |
| Hospitals | $416 | $678 |
| Parks & Recreation | $376 | $1,299 |
| Housing | $2,713 | $3,493 |
| Utilities | $2,566 | $1,978 |
| Interest on Debt | $190 | $0 |
| Other | $5,120 | $7,981 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.