Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Chicago, IL vs Seattle, WA

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Chicago spends 0.3% more per capita than Seattle ($89/person difference). Both cities share the same Fiscal Health Score.

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Chicago, IL
Pop. 2,721,914
C
61/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden61
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency22
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50
City B
Seattle, WA
Pop. 734,603
C
61/100
Budget Balance69
Debt Burden50
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency22
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Chicago
Seattle
Total Spending
$94.0B
$25.3B
Spending / Capita
$34,551
$34,463
Total Revenue
$231.6B
$56.5B
Revenue / Capita
$85,083
$76,958
Total Debt
$2.7B
$808.1M
Debt / Capita
$977
$1,100
Population
2,721,914
734,603
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection
Chicago$10,754
Seattle$210
Highways & Roads
Chicago$930
Seattle$0
Parks & Recreation
Chicago$122
Seattle$3,923
Education
Chicago$0
Seattle$1,461
Health
Chicago$426
Seattle$1,131

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

ChicagoSeattle
Property Tax
$26
$1,831
Sales Tax
$74
$1,094
Income Tax
$229
$3,496
Intergovernmental
$85,083
$9,846
Charges & Fees
$2,847
$3,960
Other
$3,463
$8,544

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

ChicagoSeattle
Fire Protection
$10,754
$210
Highways & Roads
$930
$0
Education
$0
$1,461
Public Welfare
$1,858
$3,439
Health
$426
$1,131
Hospitals
$1,444
$1,871
Parks & Recreation
$122
$3,923
Housing
$6,520
$3,727
Sewerage
$129
$952
Utilities
$2,983
$6,489
Other
$9,385
$11,260
C
Chicago, IL
Fiscal Health Score: 61/100
Average fiscal health
C
Seattle, WA
Fiscal Health Score: 61/100
Average fiscal health

Compare More Cities