Chicago, IL vs Columbus, OH
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Chicago, IL outspends Columbus, OH by a wide margin per resident — $34,551 versus $18,858, a 83% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Chicago, IL holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 61/100 (grade C) against 52/100 (grade C) for Columbus, OH — a 9-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Chicago, IL carries the lighter load at $977 per resident versus $1,145 for Columbus, OH. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Chicago, IL leads with fire protection at $10,754 per resident, while Columbus, OH leads with parks and recreation at $2,168.
Summary
Chicago spends 83.2% more per capita than Columbus ($15,693/person difference). Chicago, IL has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 61/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $26 | $10 |
| Sales Tax | $74 | $234 |
| Income Tax | $229 | $1 |
| Intergovernmental | $85,083 | $0 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,847 | $2,389 |
| Other | $3,463 | $5,248 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $10,754 | $1,016 |
| Highways & Roads | $930 | $224 |
| Public Welfare | $1,858 | $878 |
| Health | $426 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $1,444 | $953 |
| Parks & Recreation | $122 | $2,168 |
| Housing | $6,520 | $4,303 |
| Sewerage | $129 | $1 |
| Utilities | $2,983 | $1,719 |
| Other | $9,385 | $7,595 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.