Chicago, IL vs Arlington, TX
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Chicago, IL outspends Arlington, TX by a wide margin per resident — $34,551 versus $11,769, a 194% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Arlington, TX holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 83/100 (grade A) against 61/100 (grade C) for Chicago, IL — a 22-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Arlington, TX carries the lighter load at $594 per resident versus $977 for Chicago, IL. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Chicago, IL leads with fire protection at $10,754 per resident, while Arlington, TX leads with parks and recreation at $1,352.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 100% of total revenue in Chicago, IL and 41% in Arlington, TX.
Summary
Chicago spends 193.6% more per capita than Arlington ($22,782/person difference). Arlington, TX has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 83/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $26 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $74 | $507 |
| Income Tax | $229 | $73 |
| Intergovernmental | $85,083 | $25,062 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,847 | $2,949 |
| Other | $3,463 | $3,897 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $10,754 | $160 |
| Highways & Roads | $930 | $149 |
| Public Welfare | $1,858 | $826 |
| Health | $426 | $219 |
| Hospitals | $1,444 | $152 |
| Parks & Recreation | $122 | $1,352 |
| Housing | $6,520 | $2,981 |
| Sewerage | $129 | $141 |
| Utilities | $2,983 | $1,385 |
| Other | $9,385 | $4,404 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.