Charlotte, NC vs Boston, MA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Boston, MA outspends Charlotte, NC by a wide margin per resident — $72,299 versus $15,854, a 356% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Charlotte, NC edges Boston, MA on the Fiscal Health Score by 7 points — 63/100 (grade C) to 56/100 (grade C). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
On debt, Boston, MA carries the lighter load at $445 per resident versus $2,690 for Charlotte, NC. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Charlotte, NC leads with parks and recreation at $1,571 per resident, while Boston, MA leads with education at $30,742.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Charlotte, NC at 10% of total revenue, whereas Boston, MA relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 17%.
Summary
Boston spends 78.1% more per capita than Charlotte ($56,445/person difference). Charlotte, NC has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 63/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $541 | $78 |
| Income Tax | $366 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $1,859 | $5,357 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,459 | $2,784 |
| Other | $4,866 | $4,557 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $463 | $1,107 |
| Highways & Roads | $41 | $594 |
| Education | $0 | $30,742 |
| Public Welfare | $672 | $1,110 |
| Health | $0 | $725 |
| Hospitals | $1,243 | $2,584 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,571 | $711 |
| Housing | $3,944 | $6,614 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $355 |
| Utilities | $2,244 | $3,402 |
| Interest on Debt | $2,226 | $0 |
| General Admin | $0 | $5,401 |
| Other | $3,448 | $18,955 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.